[No: LXXXIX | December 12, 2017 | By Viveka Hansen]
This case study will give a few examples of the very extensive continuous textile trade, which had existed for several centuries in London at this time. Including haberdashers, drapers, tailors, dressmakers – named mantua-makers in the 18th century – and many more specialist occupations. The historical essay will be accompanied by trade cards, censuses, artworks, information from a travel journal and comparisons with my earlier research into the drapery trade in the coastal town of Whitby. Emotional perspectives will also be touched upon via the rare depiction of a young draper’s apprentice leaving his mother for settling into his long training period, together with the reality of bankruptcy for many businesses in the rapidly growing trade and desire for shopping.
The numbers of workers and businesses – drapers, tailors, dressmakers, needlewomen and several other occupations connected with the sewing and selling of clothes – responded to a naturally increasing need according to a town’s size. Though with exceptions to some extent from and after the mid 19th century when factories producing ready-made clothes caused tailors and dressmakers to concentrate more strongly in certain places. A significant period in the textile trade occurred in about 1815, even though the Industrial Revolution had already begun during the second half of the 18th century, but it was not until some little way into the 19th that industrial production in the textile field reached its full strength. This meant that everything from fabric, knitted goods, laces and embroidery could now increasingly be made by machinery, which appreciably increased speed of production and also made it ever more possible for the expanding middle classes in particular to buy more clothes for less money.
As mentioned above, the shops increased in number and ever more people having an opportunity to find employment in the manufacture and selling of drapery and other textiles. As the supply of available goods continued to grow, many of the larger shops actually developed into department stores. Naturally the cities went in for the most comprehensive specialisation, both in number, size of businesses and what was on offer for sale which saw an undiminished increase during the whole period up to 1914. Whilst in a small town the drapers’ shops often sold everything a customer could want – with the occasional exception of haberdashers and mercers.
From about the middle of the 19th century steadily increasing sales of cloth and clothes also necessitated a greater number of shop assistants. This work was considered suitable for young women from the middle classes, since it required good manners and standard speech without too strong a dialect. But even if this work was less strenuous than that of home dressmakers and factory workers, here too pay was low and working hours long. In addition, with the larger stores and department stores in London and other cities it became normal for shop assistants to live near their work. Though this requirement seems to have become rare by the early 20th century, since the 1911 census for the central drapery district of London seldom if ever shows tailors, dressmakers or shop assistants living in such places as Montpelier Street, Regent Street, Oxford Street, New Bond Street or Savile Row where many textile-related stores had their premises. There were exceptions, but these were usually tailors or assistants in drapery shops who had reached such a high position that they were able to keep servants in their own homes. There were several examples of this in Savile Row, where the tailor Edward Curties lived with his dressmaker wife Agnes Curties their household including both a ‘Cook domestic’ and a ‘Housemaid domestic’. In the same street lived the corset maker Bathilde Louise Gilson, also with two servants in her household. In other words, while not many textile workers in the early 20th century were able to afford to live near their work in the expensive central parts of London, in a small coastal town like Whitby it was the exact opposite, with the oldest and most central parts of the town housing large numbers of the town’s poor side-by-side with established drapery stores.
But the crowded streets of central London caught for instance already the attention of the Swedish traveller J P Bager in his Impressions of London from the Late Summer of 1840 (29th August). He noted: ’A considerable obstacle for making headway on the streets is, more than the swarming crowds of people, through which one quickly learns to negotiate on the excellent and wide pavements, the seductively inviting and constantly beautiful and tastefully varied boutiques… In these windows one can see either a lady or a proud man, made of wax, dressed in the most fashionable clothes, hats, millinery and other adornments so several people can inspect from all sides as they slowly wander around. The owners of houses with such exhibitions are mostly perfumery or fashion traders.’
– Adburgham, Alison, Shops and Shopping 1800-1914, London 1967.
– Bager, J P, Impressions of London from the Late Summer of 1840, London & Whitby 2001.
– British Museum, Collection online – trade cards draper.
– Census 1911, Findmypast.
– Hansen, Viveka, ‘Forgotten Victorian Textile Observations’, TEXTILIS (November 7, 2013).
– Hansen, Viveka, The Textile History of Whitby 1700-1914 – A lively coastal town between the North Sea and North York Moors, London & Whitby 2015 (From the section: ‘Textile Occupations and Trades from a Wider Perspective’ pp 54-55 & apprentice indenture p 94). For full list of Notes & Bibliography, pp 404-423.
– The London Gazette, Part 1, Jan. 1, 1814 – June 28, 1814, p 891. (Google book, The State University of Iowa Library).
PLEASE REFERENCE AS FOLLOWS:
– Hansen, Viveka, ‘The Clothing and Fabric Trade in London – 1780 to 1914’, TEXTILIS (December 12, 2017); https://textilis.net/ (Accessed: Day/Month/Year)